🔗 Share this article

Turns out he was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.